May 5 Posted 2 years ago
That's an excellent analysis of the series of events, Craig.
It also raises implicitly the question of how far statutory office holders can appropriately go in being activists for a cause closely bound up with their statutory obligations.
The Human Rights Commission - which includes the Disability Commissioner's role - has a range of obligations, including education about the Australian human rights regime. It also has a responsibility to resolve complaints under the legislation. It declares on its website that it is committed to fulfilling its mission by being, inter alia, "open, expert, committed and impartial". I would read Innes' contribution here as going for "committed" at the expense of any pretence at being "open" or "impartial". I wonder how an employer, reading this, would feel about appearing before the Commission on a complaint of disability discrimination.
In my view, however good the cause and however worthy the intention, his action is a political act and could put at risk the scope for other statutory officers to engage via social media. He and other activists would no doubt think otherwise.
And from a totally pragmatic viewpoint, surely it would not have been hard to prompt someone else, not encumbered by a mission statement declaring impartiality, to get up the petition? :)
For the record, I once - long ago - served as national director of public education for the Commission.
January 12, 2016An exclusive, live webinar from Social Media Today January 12th at 12pm EST / 9am PST Description coming soon.
December 15, 2015An exclusive, live webinar on December 15th at 12pm ET/9am PT Description coming soon.
September 08, 2015Find out how today’s top marketers are using social display to build brand love and grow business. Download “The Pursuit of Social Persuasi...
September 03, 2015The Social Customer Service Index 2015Measuring Use and Effectiveness of Social Media Tools for Customer Service An exclusive whitepaper bro...