April 21, 2015Organizations should treat social media as they would any other electronically stored information and assume it is potentially discoverable. Und...
March 26, 2015Feeling overwhelmed by the massive amount of customer feedback data you’re collecting? You’re not alone! Many businesses are struggling to find...
February 20, 2015Symantec, the global technology security provider, needed to provide its global customer base access to social customer service. They were...
February 20, 2015An Employee Advocacy program has value beyond your company’s marketing department. The community you build will be the single most important...
Jun 17 Posted 8 months ago
LunaMetrics guy here who saw this in a brand-monitoring alert. Thanks for the name-drop. I think you were referring to this post by @: http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2013/08/19/frequency-post-facebook-twitter.
Personally, I agree that optimal posting frequency is highly dependent on network, audience, and your business' situation and strengths. I always caution against blindly copying what other's are doing or blindly adhering to anyone else's recommended posting frequency #s.
That said, I do agree that Twitter is "typically" where you need to post most frequently. I think frequency on G+, FB, LI are all highly dependent on situation.
G+ warrants more effort and posting for those in certain marketing niches (internet marketers obviously love G+ for example), with technically savy audiences, and where SEO is a priority (G+ has the best (indirect) SEO benefits per share).
LI is all about b2b and recruiting (sales and careers) and varies wildly from niche to niche - we almost entirely ignore LI posts for some clients, but for a select few, LI is the top network.
It all varies wildly; good experimentation is key.