People, we're in the middle of a hashtag epidemic and we have to put a stop to it. The use of hashtags has gone way beyond any reasonable scale, and what was once a handy tool is in danger of being horribly diluted. In this post, I'll look at the history of the hashtag, the issues the humble hashtag is currently facing and how they should be used.
Let me take you back to South by South West 2007. Twitter had been launched a year earlier and users of the service were generating 20,000 tweets per day (currently stands at around 400 million per day), the clever Twitter team installed plasma screens in various concourses etc at SXSW and streamed tweets from the event. People started to take more and more notice and daily tweets increased to around 60,000. Twitter gained much coverage and from there continued to grow into the social media giant we know and love today.
The increase of tweets brought with it a number of problems, one of which was the question of categorising information and content on Twitter - with more and more tweets flying around, how do you ensure it's easy to find what you're looking for?
The hash symbol (#) had previously been used in IT and coding, for example in the 'C' language, so hashtagging as we know it now wasn't the symbols first use in a digital sense. On August 26th, 2007, Chris Messina proposed the use of 'hashtag' in order to allow people to categorise information on Twitter, but also as a way of creating some form of 'groups'. His idea was further explored by Stowe Boyd. The Twitter hashtag was born!
Bringing things up to date, we now see hashtags used on Twitter (and further social media, but I'm focussing on Twitter just now) for a number of reasons, briefly, these are:
But then they started appearing everywhere. In TV adverts, advertising posters, movie trailers, junk mail, TV shows, political campaigns, tattoos, your Granny's house and just about anywhere you can display text. The world saw the hashtag as a way to create content and buzz around their brand, message, campaign, charity efforts and so on. Something that was intended to be a simple operator has been tainted. Forever. One of the key reasons for this is a misunderstanding of the correct use of hashtags, but also every Tom, Dick and Harry jumping on them in desperation to be seen to be using them - 'oh yeah use a hashtag, it'll make us look cutting edge'. Kind of like QR codes...
My hometown of Edinburgh has been implementing a tram system for the past 32 years, it has cost four gazillion pounds, shut down numerous businesses and given taxi drivers even more to rant about. In all seriousness, it has been a major debacle and embarrassment, but the trams will be live to the people of this fair city (and our numerous guests) on May 31st. Woop. The tram operators currently have numerous lamp-post ads across the city with two key messages - one supplying us with the launch date and one telling us all to be careful around the trams. Silent killers. Both use a hashtag - #readytoroll and #carefulnow. Thanks to @dshirlaw for this pic!
Why is this a rubbish use of hashtags?
There's actually no need for this to have a hashtag. The aim here would be to get people tweeting messages related to being safe around the trams and tagging it with #carefulnow. Is this happening? Search twitter (or click here) and you'll see a few tweets from the tram operator/their staff and some people referring to the fact that 'careful now' was a phrase used in an episode popular comedy show 'Father Ted'. Outside of that, we can see that #carefulnow is used for all manner of other purposes outside of Edinburgh tram safety. Their use of this hashtag is failing to amplify their message and due to that, serves no purpose. If they really had to use a hashtag here, it should've been something completely unique to their campaign. It really isn't hard to do the tiny little bit of research that is required to discover if your tag is unique, run a twitter searchfor it and you'll get your answer quickly! Aside from the uniqueness issue, this is a prime example of 'I want one of those' syndrome. The #readytoroll tag isn't fairing any better either. This is just one example of the overuse and misguided use of hashtags.
I took to Twitter earlier today and asked:
Writing a blog post about the hashtag overkill epidemic, wondering how many of you use hashtags to find info on Twitter? — Mike McGrail (@mike_mcgrail) May 19, 2014
The answers that came back all had similar points - people use them to search for info on set topics or to follow live events, news etc:
@mike_mcgrail Most of the columns on my TweetDeck are hashtag searches I reference over the course of every day. — Michelle Rodger (@tartancat) May 19, 2014
@mike_mcgrail Only search using hashtags if there's a specific discussion happening otherwise not (search results are the same without). — Editing Angel (@editingangel) May 19, 2014
@mike_mcgrail Do a wee bit for #Recruitment but mix it up with searches for just 'Recruitment' — Chris McColgan (@Ecom_Chris) May 19, 2014
@mike_mcgrail Use to follow conferences, race and discussions. — Daniel Gerber (@GlasgowOsteo) May 19, 2014
@mike_mcgrail The only time I use a # is when I want to monitor topics or events that I have an interest in... Never from a commercial etc! — Matthew Marley (@matthewmarley) May 19, 2014
@mike_mcgrail only for events and the occasional big news story. — Kate Newton (@katenewtonpr) May 19, 2014
While this is far from conclusive research, it does show me that people are using hashtags for their original purpose and that perhaps using them as part of so many promotions, campaigns etc isn't having the effect that many would hope. Of course, there are numerous hashtag success stories, but there are far more #fails.
It's time everyone started getting more sensible about the use of hashtags and stopped viewing them as a 'must have'. If things continue the way they are, we'll end up in a right old mess!
How do you feel about hashtags? How do you use them on Twitter? Do you have a great hashtag fail to share? Feel free to comment below...
Read the original post here.