Oct 7 Posted 3 years ago
That appears a little incomplete and narrow focussed with respect to the participants. Also, the assertion that someone is interesting because they have a large number of followers isn't necessarily accurate. Many celebrities tweet about the most innane fap yet still maintain a high number of followers. Beiber spits on people yet still has millions of fans.
Another key archetype I think you have missed is the specialists. There certainly are a number of tweeters whom prescribe to a particular ideology or interest. For example, most of the key tweeters you mentioned earlier, are tweeters about tweeting and SM.
Sure there are thousands of SM specialists on twitter, but there are also specialists for political movements, recreational pastimes, and, research and information. Obviously these are found by searching for particular hashtags.
Ultimately though, you also forgot the regular people. I find them much more intresting than the professionals. They just make conversation rather than giving you "10 reasons why your avatar may be losing you followers" and a link to a really really really important essential white paper. /sarcasm
Webinars On Demand
January 25, 2017While we’ve had access to the Internet since the early 1990s, we’ve only started to experience the full effects of its disruption on public rela...
December 07, 2016It's finally happened, social media has grown up and sold out. And it's awesome. For digital marketers, the maturing advertising options on soci...
Video is expected to account for three-quarters of all mobile traffic by 2020. But, creating powerful, effective video requires a significa...
Marketers are constantly seeking to engage with their buyers and drive actions that help buyers move rapidly through their customer lifecycl...