In a new Social Advocacy and Politics post, Dr. Alan Rosenblatt questions whether in the new, always connected, always watching world, will we reach a point where being under constant surveillance affects how we behave?
While many of us seek an authentic connection with people of similar values and policy goals via social media, there are some who use the medium to create a network of fictional activists seeking to promote the goals of one side or the other.
While dirty tricks have been part and parcel of our political system from the very beginning, the tenor of this year’s campaign season has already slipped across the line at least once, and there's much concern that it'll get worse.
Traditionally, businesses avoid taking positions on public policy issues for the simple reason that their goal is to maximize sales. Taking an issue position runs the risk of alienating potential customers on the other side of that issue. But increasingly, businesses are finding that either their customer base is far more likely to favor a particular policy position or the company’s leadership has a strong position that they are willing to endorse even if it costs some customers. Regardless of the reason, it is certain that businesses need to think carefully about taking a public-facing policy position and be willing to stick to their decision. Otherwise, they likely risk a social media marketing crisis.
By now you probably know that I think there is a conversion factor between social media touches and votes. Just as campaign consultants have their conversion numbers for the number of door knocks, yard signs, handshakes and baby kisses are needed to secure one vote, there is a number for social media touches to one vote. I still don’t know the number, but each primary this season gives us another observation for our data set.