Connect with us:
Social Media Today on FacebookFollow SocialMedia2day on TwitterJoin SocialMediaToday LinkedIn Group

Facebook Changes Facebook Page Admin Panel

Facebook Changes Facebook Page Admin Panel

Facebook's drive to push businesses to spend money on each and every post continues.

If you have a Facebook Page, previously, when you opened Facebook and went to your Page, above your Page would be your Admin panel that gave you a snapshot of what was going on with your Page at that moment, including messages, Insights and notifications. Now, however, notifications which were prominent in the upper left corner have been replaced with a new Posts area.

At first glance, Posts is interesting because it lists all of your posts in a simple table view that includes the title of the post and how many people that post has reached (Total Reach). It also includes a separate column for Paid Reach, and now a not so subtle suggestion to "Get More Reach" (Facebook's new term for paying to promote your own post).

In the lower right corner, the first Page Tip is a new video on promoting your post.

And of course the lower left corner continues to suggest that you pay for more Page Likes, though for me at least the recommended Daily Budget has increased by 200%.

What is happening is that in order to be "successful" on Facebook, businesses are feeling forced to pay to get more Page Likes, and then feeling forced to pay again to get those same paid fans to see individual posts, since Facebook's EdgeRank algorithm frequently hides Page Posts from fans.

And since Facebook will not reveal how the EdgeRank algorithm works, businesses and marketers are left to guess. Conventional wisdom has been to create "more engaging" posts that include pictures and questions, but recent evidence suggests that such a tactic may no longer work. On a Facebook Page with over 2,500 fans, posts that included an image were getting a 1% reach on average, while posts with no image or question, just text, achieved an average 12% reach!

The problem is that Facebook's revenue model is not working. Too many businesses are investing in Facebook promotions and advertising and seeing little to no return on their investment. But instead of offering more innovative ways to reach fans and create revenue, Facebook is pushing even harder on their failed techniques and methodology.

I have seen this in my own business as well as that of clients. When comparing the amount of money spent on Facebook versus Google+, and then looking at the amount of website traffic, leads and sales generated, the differences are both staggering and alarming.

Of course, like any social network, Facebook will be more effective and successful for some businesses rather than others. Typically, if your business targets consumers, Facebook can be a good fit. B2B marketers, while still using Facebook predominantly, are struggling and turning to alternatives like Google+.

Have you invested any advertising dollars into Facebook? Has your business seen positive activity as a result?

Join The Conversation

  • pattihale's picture
    Apr 26 Posted 4 years ago pattihale

    I was pleased with the traffic and engagement I was getting with Facebook but thought I should advertise in order to get more fans--which I did. I was pleased with the response I got. But now.....the number of fans seeing my posts is less than what I had before I advertised. Doh!

    I had intended to do more Facebook advertising but now I'm peeved. . . and spend more time on Google+!

  • Bill Hipsher's picture
    Apr 22 Posted 4 years ago Bill Hipsher

    We have had great success with Facebook advertising, especially on a local level with our brick and mortar clients.  There is a learning curve for sure in creating successful ads that have a ROI that justify continuing with Facebook advertising but I would encourage people to stick with it until they find something that works.  Our first 6 months of testing ads showed some of the lowest ROI's we had seen with any of the paid online advertising options in front of us.  Today we see very positive results.  Again, with larger clients lacking strong brand presence and product line-ups that just aren't very glamorous it has been difficult.  Local clients selling b2c have seen best results.  

  • Mike Thompson's picture
    Apr 22 Posted 4 years ago Mike Thompson

    It was definitely disappointing to see the loss of notifications over showing our own posts back to us but in terms of business success it very much depends on your target demographic and location. Facebook advertising has been very successful for my agency on behalf of clients while Google+ produced zero results, even on a nationwide compaign including offline marketing driving social interaction. Facebook organic and PPC interaction was high and click through rates were excellent but Google+ has never really taken off in the UK and especially not in Ireland. This was confirmed in a meeting with Google at their European headquarters in Dublin in January of this year when they agreed uptake for Google+ was incredibly low here.

    B2B marketing definitely has greater reach and conversion on LinkedIn and via blogs but Facebook remains a mainstream point of contact and opportunity for branding. As you said, B2C marketing works well on Facbeook, particularly in the hospitality sector but for local businesses in the UK and Ireland, Google+ remains bottom of the big five social networks. (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube & Google+).

Webinars On Demand

  • May 09, 2017
    With all of the technologies available to marketers today, have we lost that personal touch? Join VP of Content Marketing for ON24, Mark Bornste...
  • April 05, 2017
    In the ever-changing world of digital marketing, operational efficiency, quick turn-around times, testing and adapting to change are crucial to...