Jul 1 Posted 10 months ago
What Facebook did is absolutely unethical. You need to make a subject aware that a psychological experiment is being done to them prior to subjecting them to it. As to the legality of it - https://twitter.com/kashhill/status/483767776427798528 - they amended their terms to include 'research' four months after the study, though in the end they have a pretty blanket T&C so I'm sure that even without this addition, there will be no lawsuit.
Personally, I wonder how this effected people's personal lives (did those that received negative news feeds also experience a more negative work/home life)? It's definitely not shocking, but it's also sad that at the end of the day there will be very little to no adverse impact to Facebook.
June 16, 2015In the past two years, LinkedIn has become a must-do for brands, whether you love it or hate it, especially for B2B brands. But without a Linked...
June 02, 2015Brands have come to rely on social listening to determine what their customers want and what might be threatening the strength of the brand. Man...
May 14, 2015If you're starting from a clean slate when it comes to video marketing, this comprehensive ebook is for you. The Video Marketing Handbook co...
April 30, 2015Has your manager demanded to know your tweet-to-sales ratio? If you're on the front lines of social, you know that the ROI of social can be...