Nov 3 Posted 4 years ago
I agree with most of your points, but disagree with your premise that Klout et al are a permanent fixture of the social media landscape. Klout, I feel, thinks it is selling a solution when they really have a feaure. Most social media monitoring tools of any worth have in them a way of determining salience, aka influence. Most search engines will get there soon too. This is where this "feature" belongs, in a context that has some value.
I agree too that the secret sauce algorithms are plainly faulty, but then the validity of all these systems is suspect -- when it comes down to it, was is "influence" anyway???
Finally, there's a bigger issue with Klout - they may be measuring the wrong things entirely. Individuals alone only rarely make a difference; social media is a collective phenomenon and it is the crowd -- or often the mob -- that matter:
Thanks again, great post.
Webinars On Demand
February 16, 2016The following is the webinar archive for "Storytelling Gone Wild: The Key to Creating Viral Content." This webinar originally aired on February...
February 09, 2016The following is the webinar archive for "Social Listening: Harness Marketing Insights from Consumer Conversations." This webinar originally air...
February 05, 2016Facebook contests and campaigns are powerful ways for brands to engage with customers in social. They encourage social sharing, spur user-ge...
December 15, 2015New Research to Drive Smarter Social Strategy It’s no secret that social moves fast. So our research and analytics team mines social data,...