Nov 3 Posted 4 years ago
I agree with most of your points, but disagree with your premise that Klout et al are a permanent fixture of the social media landscape. Klout, I feel, thinks it is selling a solution when they really have a feaure. Most social media monitoring tools of any worth have in them a way of determining salience, aka influence. Most search engines will get there soon too. This is where this "feature" belongs, in a context that has some value.
I agree too that the secret sauce algorithms are plainly faulty, but then the validity of all these systems is suspect -- when it comes down to it, was is "influence" anyway???
Finally, there's a bigger issue with Klout - they may be measuring the wrong things entirely. Individuals alone only rarely make a difference; social media is a collective phenomenon and it is the crowd -- or often the mob -- that matter:
Thanks again, great post.
Webinars On Demand
June 15, 2016Building an effective goal-driven strategy, advanced campaign optimization, making sense of massive amounts of data from many channels — these a...
May 25, 2016Up to 80% of email databases are classified as inactive. These "sleepy subscribers" haven't engaged with your emails in months, which negativ...
February 05, 2016Facebook contests and campaigns are powerful ways for brands to engage with customers in social. They encourage social sharing, spur user-ge...
November 24, 2015An exclusive report brought to you by Social Media Today and Hinge These days, cutting edge companies know that if they aren't leveraging t...