LinkedIn Influencers: Good or Bad for Pharma?

Posted on April 9th 2014

LinkedIn Influencers: Good or Bad for Pharma?

ImageLike many, I was intrigued when LinkedIn first launched its ‘influencer’ blogging programme, back in late 2012. It seemed to be a significant step for the world’s largest professional network in going from being a connector towards a conversation driver, with good content forming the basis for good discussion (and yes, I know groups have been around for longer, but there are far too few with any decent conversation on them).

It had some impressive names lined up in its portfolio right from the start, such as Richard Branson and Barack Obama, and invited others to submit their applications for a slot. I, like many others, did so and looked forward to writing alongside such influential figures.

I waited…and waited…and waited, but nothing. Eventually, after much prompting of LinkedIn I was told that the program had been closed to further applications. It was disappointing this had not been proactively communicated but I had no pretence about being that important, so moved on.

Then, as more and more people started appearing as LinkedIn Influencers, I had a feeling that they might have missed an opportunity. It started to raise fundamental questions in my mind around how we measure influence and who, therefore, are influencers. I also noticed that the world of pharma and healthcare seemed woefully under-represented.

Here, the story skips forward more than a year to early 2014, when the first ‘pharma’ influencer was proudly announced by LinkedIn, with it being none other than Pfizer CEO Ian Read, the top man at the world’s biggest pharma company (by revenue). His piece was entitled ‘You Gain Respect in Drops, But Can Lose It in Gallons’ and talked about the reputational challenges faced by the pharma industry.

It should have been a monumental moment for the industry, but it actually left me feeling a little cold. While the piece raised some very valid points on a key issue for the industry and was mostly spoken in a very human way, it did slip into some corporate spin and ultimately left me feeling not entirely convinced that it was the voice of Ian Read himself.

Note my choice of words there – I talked about ‘voice’, not who had written it, as I would fully expect a busy CEO to have someone ghost write the piece for them. But the key thing for me about influence, when it comes to blogging, is that it has to have real passion behind it – you have to really believe that the author feels really strongly about the issue, making it worth their time to shout about it. That way, whether you agree with them or not, they will have somehow influenced your views. This piece didn’t do that for me.

But this is not intended to be a critique of Ian Read’s blogging. He’s not someone in know personally, but he’s clearly an extremely able and proficient businessman to make it to the top of a company like Pfizer. The critique more comes back to LinkedIn’s choice of influencers, which seem to disproportionately be C-level execs in big global companies. Of course these people hold influence in business circles (and certainly within their own companies) but they are not always the visionaries who drive broader change and influence the everyday person.

You see, social media has democratised influence in a way that also allows people who are not in senior positions in big companies to have a real voice for driving change. In the world of healthcare, I’m talking about healthcare providers, patients, technologists, payers, scientists and, of course, pharma personnel below C-level, who have a real passion for solving problems related to disease. I did, for example, suggest to LinkedIn via Twitter that it might like to proactively reach out to some empowered patients to become part of its influencer program, and offered to help put them in touch, but they were not interested to discuss further.

My cynical side therefore feels that the LinkedIn Influencer program was too skewed by the desire to get more C-level exec profiles created and give a podium to those who, ultimately, are the decision-makers at LinkedIn’s biggest corporate clients, taking it away from some of the real, on-the-ground influencers out there.

But I’m an optimist and there is a happy(ish) ending to this story. LinkedIn recently started rolling out the ability to write influencer posts to more users, with a view towards everyone eventually having this ability. Users who are able to do this will apparently see a pencil icon near the share button, according to Mashable, which will let them publish such longer pieces to their profile. I’m not one of these blessed users so far, but if you believe the reports it should eventually reach everyone.

If this does happen, it could make LinkedIn a much more interesting place when it comes to healthcare, meaning all the groups mentioned above who currently use their own blogs, Twitter, Facebook etc. might find an interesting new home and one that is more closely followed by the corporate leaders with the power to make change happen.

So if you are in healthcare and are one of the select few who can now submit influencers posts then get in touch – I’d love to hear your views on it – and to read what you, the real influencers on the front line, have to say, alongside the business leaders.

Paul Tunnah

Paul Tunnah

CEO, pharmaphorum

Paul Tunnah is CEO & Founder of pharmaphorum media,which provides digital content marketing and communications solutions for the pharma sector and also manages the industry leading channelwww.pharmaphorum.com, a digital podium for communicating thought leadership and innovation within pharma. For queries he can be reached through the site contact form or on Twitter@pharmaphorum.

See Full Profile >

Comments

MCCCODE
Posted on April 9th 2014 at 7:11AM

Hi Paul great article

i get your sentiment in regards to the beacon who is suppose to represent your industry, i know pharmacy is a really complicated topic for the public not the professional worker at the different levels and tasks of that industry.

For me is something similar the beacons on payments are Paypal's CEO and the Vp of technology at Visa, and yet i do not feel they represent nor understand the realities of the payment industry. But there is a lot of value on what they have to say as well.

My guess on the influencer program is that will rise and fall and partially you have insinuated it on your post as if the current influencers are not ghost riders they certainly are not engaging into a conversation, so the same post on "the state of my industry" could have been published on the WSJ with out the promise of the interactivity.

igorbutor
Posted on April 9th 2014 at 8:48AM
Wow Paul this is a rly great article. Thx for sharing.
Ajay Prasad
Posted on April 9th 2014 at 1:19PM

Really very informative post on LiknedIn. The social media is really proving a very influential in connecting professional people. Since the time it launched, it is getting very much popularity and is becoming very popular. Great read. Thanks.