#SMTLive Schedule

A Scheduling Conflict: Hootsuite vs. Buffer

Hootsuite or Buffer? Buffer or Hootsuite? The question floats around social media circles and comes up time and time again. For me, it’s like asking a gamer which is better, an Xbox 360 or a PlayStation 3? Each has its own traits and features, some people will align more with one or the other. Social media thought-leader Mike Allton, a massive Hootsuite advocate, wrote an interesting piece about how he uses both Buffer and Hootsuite in his process, and the points he raised definitely highlight that there are positive points for each. But which one is best for you? Which one should you go with as your social media scheduling tool? Here’s a comparative review looking at the features of each.

Buffer Logo

There’s a lot to like about Buffer, stemming from the presentation of their product to their ongoing efforts in company transparency, to their typically high-quality blog content. Buffer is a company that’s in-tune with their audience, and that familiarity breeds loyalty – and their product reflects that community ethos. Buffer allows you to schedule content to Twitter, Facebook (personal profiles, pages or groups), LinkedIn (personal profiles, pages or groups), app.net and Google+ (pages). The user-friendly nature of Buffer is a big plus, with the profile lay-out and options clearly labelled and positioned in an intuitive and intelligent manner. For each profile, you can create your own posting schedule, based on the times you want to post – you can also get Buffer to create a schedule for you, based on best posting times to reach your audience, though this feature is not included in the free version of the app (for Twitter, you can export a best posting times listing from Followerwonk in the free version of Buffer).

Buffer - Chrome extension

Equally user friendly is the Buffer extension for Google Chrome, making the process of sharing and scheduling content simple as you go about your normal reading process – you just right-click on the page you’re reading, select ‘Buffer This Page’ from the menu options and let Buffer do the rest – it’ll come up with the title of the page, a shortened link, and it’ll provide an image which will be shared with your post (dependent on which network you’re posting to). You can then either add it to your Buffer queue (it’ll be added to the next un-filled time in your pre-set schedule), you can send it straight away, or you can manually schedule it to be sent at a time of your choosing. You can go back to your Buffer account at any time to see what you’ve got scheduled – from here you can delete, move items to the top of your Buffered content list, or you can opt to send specific posts immediately. The process is well linked up, with little lag time between scheduling from the Buffer extension to the app, and the options are clearly set out. It’s a solid, functional, scheduling process.  

Hootsuite logo

Hootsuite is somewhat different, in that what they’re offering is much more extensive. Hootsuite’s biggest advantage is the ability to add streams within your dashboard for each of your social networks and chosen keywords, making it a more complete social media management tool. While Buffer’s not trying to compete with Hootsuite on this aspect, the comparison is relevant in relation to the extended functionality of Hootsuite. In the free version of Hootsuite, you can schedule content to be posted to Twitter, Facebook (personal profiles, pages or groups), Google+ (pages), LinkedIn (personal profiles, pages or groups), Foursquare, Wordpress and mixi. As you can see, there is a difference in connectivity, with Buffer supporting app.net, and Hootsuite supporting the latter three listed – for most users, this is not a major differentiating factor, but obviously something to consider in your choice. Hootsuite allows you to schedule content at your own, manually chosen times, or you can use Hootsuite’s auto-scheduling option, which will allocate the best times to post based on your followers and connections. This feature was recently updated to give users more control over the days and times in which they would like their schedule to operate, similar to the functionality within Buffer.


Hootsuite’s Chrome extension is called Hootlet, something which the Hootsuite team have been refining and improving over time. Right-clicking on any page and selecting ‘Share Page via Hootlet’ opens up a Hootsuite scheduling window on-screen, enabling you to schedule the content to be shared to the network of choice. This is then added to your ‘Publisher’ queue in your Hootsuite dashboard, linked up to the rest of your social media management tasks. While the scheduling functionality covers all the same options as Buffer, another aspect of Hootlet is the clever Twitter search functionality, linked in to your Google searches. For any search you conduct in Google, you can click on the Hootlet tab at the right of screen to see the matches for your chosen search terms in Twitter also, giving you a more complete overview of how the terms are being used across the web. When using Google Maps or Yelp, Hootlet also enables a ‘Tweets Near Here’ option when searching for a specific address – clicking on this will show all tweets within a chosen radius of the address (using Twitter geolocation), helpful for reviews or to get an idea of what’s being discussed in a specific region.

So Which Scheduling App Wins?

In the end, there isn’t a significant difference between the two, in terms of scheduling options - the differentiating factor between the two is less about functionality and more about personal preference. Definitely, at one stage, Buffer had the clear lead in scheduling capability, but the improvement of Hootlet and Hootsuite’s auto-scheduling options have helped elevate Hootsuite’s offering to the same level on all fronts. For me, the pairing of Hootsuite and Hootlet links up your entire social presence on the one platform, which is much more valuable and efficient, in terms of managing your overall presence. Having my scheduled content linked into my Hootsuite dashboard means I can oversee every aspect – keyword monitoring, mentions and responses, as well as scheduling – all from the one place. In terms of scheduling functionality, you can’t really go wrong with either, but as a wholly inclusive option, and with the additional search functions of Hootlet, Hootsuite wins out.

How about you, Hootsuite or Buffer? Pick your side in the comments below.  

Join The Conversation

  • Nicole Miller's picture
    Jul 25 Posted 2 years ago Nicole Miller

    Hi there Andrew -- 

    This is a terrific post with such great information! Thank you for your look at Buffer and Hootsuite -- we are definitely a fan of people finding the tool that works best for them and fits their needs best. 

    Keep up the amazing work you're doing and thank you again! :) 



    Community Champion at Buffer


  • davidwkyle's picture
    Jul 23 Posted 3 years ago davidwkyle

    Hi Tamara,

    Sorry that some of your your scheduled posts were interrupted in the past. Product stability is our biggest priority and our development team is working on achieving a 99.9999% 'Up' time. We're well on the way now. If you were willing to try Hootsuite again, let me know (Twitter: @davidwkyle) and we can chat through email. Buffer and Hootsuite work very well in tandem as well. 

    - David from Hootsuite 

  • davidwkyle's picture
    Jul 23 Posted 3 years ago davidwkyle

    Hi Christin,

    Thanks for reading the post about Hootsuite and Buffer - like you said, it's a good resource. We're also excited that things are moving so quickly, it makes working at Hootsuite challenging and fun all at the same time. 

    Definitely agree that the people at Buffer are great, we have nothing but positive interactions with them!

    Thanks for recognizing the improvements we've made. If you drop me a DM on Twitter (@davidwkyle) we can chat about a few more things that are coming up from Hootsuite. We've been known to send out the odd HootKit too :). 

    - David from Hootsuite  

  • Jul 22 Posted 3 years ago Annabel Smith

    I've been really happy with Buffer; my one complaint is that I can't buffer retweets when using the Twitter app on my iPhone - do you know if there is a way to do that?

  • TamaraDull's picture
    Jul 21 Posted 3 years ago TamaraDull

    You scored a Buffer t-shirt?! Nice!

  • elie.nassar.908's picture
    Jul 21 Posted 3 years ago elie.nassar.908

    Hello Andrew,

    I've been trying and trying to find the perfect social media management platform. This turned out to be harder than i expected. 

    Hootsuite vs Buffer ? 

    I tried both; both of them are great tools, but nothing can beat the dashboard of streams that is available in hootesuite. Hootsuite wins for me. 

    However a new player is in town and it's Falcon Social, i tried their Demo live with one of the salesmen there, it's absolutly amazing but the price is ridiculously high.

    I will keep on using Hootsuite for now.

  • TamaraDull's picture
    Jul 19 Posted 3 years ago TamaraDull

    Hi Andrew,

    Great post. Late last year, I was googling for HootSuite vs. Buffer articles myself. I had been using the free version of HootSuite for a few years, but after mysteriously losing all my scheduled posts on 4 separate occasions over the course of 18 months, I had to find another solution.

    That's when I discovered Buffer. Overall, I really love the app - the design, how it works, etc. The scheduling component is awesome; I love how I can tweak the schedule for one of my networks like Twitter, and all my scheduled posts are automatically updated to the new schedule.

    The one downside, as you mentioned, is that the Buffer UI doesn't allow you to set up streams. My workaround is to use the web-based TweetDeck app. I thought it would be a pain using two different apps, but they work quite well side-by-side. I use Buffer to manage and schedule and TweetDeck to view and RT from my Twitter lists.


  • bldchris's picture
    Jul 19 Posted 3 years ago bldchris

    This is a great write up, Andrew.  Particularly for anyone who hasn't test driven these two amazing tools. 

    My vote:  Buffer.  You're spot on about HootSuite's improvements and were I not so utterly in love with the people who run Buffer, I might go that route. My personal experience with Buffer, though, has been just fantastic.  It's been human (they sent me a t-shirt?!) and it's been fun.  In a few short months they've made some improvements I didn't even know I would love (their new Feeds and Suggestions options are very helpful, for instance).  I wonder what they'll think of next.

    One thing is for sure, though.  The competition is fierce and they're all moving very quickly to innovate and to keep the pace. I wonder what they'll be doing in a year's time!

Webinars On Demand

  • May 09, 2017
    With all of the technologies available to marketers today, have we lost that personal touch? Join VP of Content Marketing for ON24, Mark Bornste...
  • April 05, 2017
    In the ever-changing world of digital marketing, operational efficiency, quick turn-around times, testing and adapting to change are crucial to...