In the era of the social Web, communications is evolving back to its origins of communicating with people, not at them. It may seem implied, but communications does not, for the most part, embody two-way discussions.
Over the years, communications has evolved into a one-way distribution channel that broadcasts messages at target audiences. In the process, communications stopped being about communication, focusing instead on the marketing aspects of top-down message push and control, what we now commonly refer to as marketing communications aka marcom. Marcom embodies traditional and new marketing branches that include advertising, PR, Web/interactive, event, among many other disciplines (depending on the organization).
With the soaring popularity and adoption of Social Media, companies are realizing that in addition to marketing communications, listening and engagement is quickly becoming pervasive and necessary in order to compete for precious, yet thinned and distributed attention. The days of focusing solely on Web stickiness, eyeballs and clickthroughs are fading. These are the days of immersion, conversations, engagement, relationships, referrals, and action.
So what do we call this important and history making transformation?
Some call it Social Media Marketing, others refer to it as Conversational Marketing, and factions of other thought leaders simply classify it as the socialization of the media and marketing in general.
In the world of marcom, we're simply placing the communication back in communications. It's the transformation of monologue to dialog, and it's breaking down that walls and barriers that separate people from brands.
The problem with Social Media Marketing and Conversational Marketing as classifiers is that both still involve the word "marketing." It doesn't imply authenticity and the two-way process of listening, internalizing, and responding. Each is complementary to traditional marketing, but their intent, practice, and metrics are different. And, the socialization of communications is also unique.
Social Media Marketing is the use of social media tools to participate online in distinct people-powered communities. Conversational Marketing is first the understanding that markets are conversations and at the same time, conversations are also markets. The tools, channels, and approaches are different in this case, and actually span across advertising, marketing, SEO/search, widget marketing, word of mouth marketing (WOMM), among others - mostly. In the world of PR, Social Media Marketing, for the most part, concentrates on blogger relations and comment strategies. This is the practice of working with bloggers to retell your story and also sharing feedback and insight within comments that link back to something helpful to the community, while also benefiting the company you're representing.
Again, the difference across each of these disciplines is the intent, execution, and results of any program.
But what's transpiring now is so different, so revolutionary, that it deserves its own classification, for now, in order to advance within organizations and impact its soul and change its outlook and role within society.
For the first time in years, we're seeking to adapt Harold Lasswell's maxim as a means of describing the field of communication Theory, "who says what to whom in what channel with what effect."
Factoring peoplenomics into the modified Communication Theory aka Social Theory equation, it now epitomizes, "who hears what, who says what to whom, in what channel, with what intent, and with what effect."
The definitions and results will radically vary depending on how you mix and match those variables and which marketing or media discipline you represent.
It's now the art and science of socializing _____ (fill in the blank.)
This is the era our "Industrial Revolution:"
Towards the end of the 1990s, the Web, and its architects, forged the tools that would spark a renaissance of influence and empowerment. These tools would inspire people to build new interconnected platforms for content that would collectively and ultimately ignite a social revolution and usher a new exchange for information that has all the signs and economic potential of a modern day Industrial Revolution.
The socialization of media and information is our Industrial Revolution. For the first time in history, media technology and the tools and channels for broadcasting information has been disrupted and open for true global collaboration, while also effectively changing how people interact with each other.
The Social Revolution is the catalyst for the democratization of content and exchange of information, but we're still experimenting and wrestling with the true impact of this change and how exactly these new models, on every side of the equation, will ultimately settle.
So, if we're in the throws of a Social Revolution, does the act of socializing outbound communications require a new division within an organization?
Even though, Social Media is a stage in the overall evolution of marketing and media, and it will give way to something new and different.
In the meantime, what do we name this new division or discipline and is it simply an extension of the existing marketing department that already encompasses advertising, PR, marketing, Web, and new media? A rapidly growing list of organizations are hiring experts to lead the integration, with some earning titles of Social Media Officer and complementing existing Chief Marketing Officers.
Certainly there's no shortage of genuine and purported Social Media Experts and Social Media Gurus. But what does that mean to be an expert, and more importantly, who's truly qualified to socialize real world marketing departments with real world business demands, dependencies, infrastructure, opportunities and responsibilities?
The answer is, experience and the understanding of business and service dynamics and how the socialization of communications, development, and support impacts and benefits people and their peers. Period.
And, not the level of experience that one earns from talking about Social Media or simply participating in the newest networks.
Conversations don't scale. Talk is cheap and action speaks louder than words.
It takes so much more than the ability listen and engage. It definitely encompasses much more than the ability to create profiles on every popular social platform and the process of befriending everyone across the networks. It's the ability to identify meaningful conversations, comprehend them, determine those valuable enough to participate, and then feed that collective insight back into the organization (marketing, service, produce development, etc.) for positive change. It also requires the ability to uncover opportunities and crises to trendcast into proactive initiatives that prevent reactionary and defensive responses.
Proactive = relevancy.
Reactive = damage control.
As good friend Hugh MacLeod observed four years ago in The HughTrain, "There's only one thing harder than starting a new business: Re-inventing an old one."
Web and social tech expert Louis Gray calls Social Media Experts the "new" Webmasters. Social tools developer Greg Narain compares the current state of Social Media to the "e" in the old "e-conomy." Early on, I predicted that we would eventually see Social Media Officers as the new Chief Marketing Officers.
They're correct. And, what they share is the fact that these classifiers emerged to document important shifts, migrations, and growth stages of new mediums as well as the roles that further solidified them as catalysts for maturation.
Obviously, we're in need for a new, important stepping stone in order to escalate to the next phase in influencer and customer interaction.
Brian Morissey wrote in a recent article for Adweek, that brands need a new kind of leader, claiming, "As conversations with customer matter more, brands seek social-media evangelists."
So, which division within an organization is ready to fund this experimentation? Is it one division or is it an amalgamation of several departments?
So far, experience shows that it's different depending on the company, and the champions within each.
Peter Kim, formerly an analyst for Forrester research, recently joined a startup to help large companies engage in social media. The company was funded with $50 million from Austin Ventures was created by Razorfish founder Jeff Dachis.
Deborah Schultz, a communications professional, was tasked with creating a social infrastructure for consumer powerhouse Proctor & Gamble.
Scott Monty, a marketing expert, was recently hired to socialize the Ford brand.
Dan Schawbel, a personal branding evangelist, is the first Social Media Specialist at EMC.
Jackie Peters, an interactive and social Web marketing authority is helping Sun socialize its Startup Essentials program
Shel Holtz, a PR pro, is assisting Coca Cola and other consumer brands into Social worlds.
Connie Bensen, a community relations expert, is the Community Manager for Network Solutions.
Chris Heuer, a Web and New Media visionary, is currently guiding Intel Corporation on best practices and new opportunities for Social strategies. The company also tapped several social activists, including yours truly, to advise the company on Social Media.
Marshall Kirkpatrick, a thought leading blogger in the Web 2.0 landscape, actively publishes stories related to how companies can or can not benefit from community managers, those charged with listening to the conversations fueling relevant social networks and coordinating necessary responses and change - outbound and internally.
Personally, I've received calls from major beverage, auto, medical, green, aerospace, and entertainment brands, asking advice and seeking referrals for an internal Social champion and expert - all with the last few weeks.
The list goes on and on. These stories are only the representative few of a bigger shift within existing marketing departments as they attempt to socialize their brands.
These are the times when the social revolution is redefining how we not only communicate with our constituents, but how we as a collective organization of people, process the information, intelligence and insight garnered from external conversations to more effectively and genuinely participate.
But, Social Media isn't limited to marketing or outbound activity. Social Media benefits and develops every department within an organization. And it's for this reason, that its future and its effectiveness depends on its champions, participants, analysts, and opportunists.
The intelligence that is collected during the process of listening and observation affects everything. We can improve our products and services based on the real world input and feedback from a true, vested public focus group. We can improve and tailor our story specifically to the assemblies of people we're hoping to reach in a way that's convincing and accurate. We can enhance our inbound customer service practices to transform cost centers into customer investments. In the process, we're humanizing our brands and transforming customers into evangelists, people into storytellers, and brands into resource centers.
We're connecting brands, and the people representing them to new groups of important people, in the places where they discover and share new content and in turn, interact with each other.
This is the latest incarnation of digital communications and for the moment, it takes us back to the foundation of relationships that started everything - this time however, it's not only the tools that have changed, it's the realization that people matter to everything we do.
It's the socilization of:
Whatever discipline you represent, you are the champion for the socialization of that branch as it relates to the greater good of the company, brand, and stakeholders. Only you can specifically understand how Social strategies affect and complement the day-to-day campaigns that are already working well for your organization.
Ultimately, social initiatives will be implemented and deployed independently by each department, working with a social coordinator such as a Community Manager or Social Media Mangaer in conjunction with a CMO, VP of marketing or even a Chief Social Officer. Everything depends on the existing infratructure and social-savvy of the organization. However, it won't always be simply rooted in Social strategies. As the communications landscape evolves, business will always be influenced by new and interactive media. The landscape of communicatins and the tools used to connect people and stories will continue to evolve. Remember, this is about the sociology of Social Media. Technology changes, people don't.
Just wait until you see how semantic platforms will change the dynamics of information discovery, creation, and connectivity.
In the meantime, the future of your business hinges on the ability for champions to arise, implement, and justify the socialization of your company's ability to listen, empathize, respond, advise, and evolve based on the online discussions that are currently taking place with or without you.
Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Pownce, Plaxo, FriendFeed, or Facebook.
Related articles on PR 2.0:
The Social Revolution is Our Industrial Revolution
The Art of Conversation - Thoughts and Observations
The Art of Conversation - It's About Listening and Internalizing Before Action
The Essential Guide to Social Media
PR 2.0 Puts the Public Back in Public Relations
advertising pr pr+2.0 public+relations 2.0 media media2.0 media+2.0 brian+solis communication+theory social+media social socialmedia marketing communication communications publicity harold+lasswell maxim academic defintion theory doc+searls cluetrain manifesto hugh+macleod gapingvoid community+manager widget interactive community conversational conversation conversation+marketing
Link to original post