For many of you this self-assessment, short and powerful, may be familiar, but I only learned of it a few days ago from my sister, a professional mediator. The Thomas-Kilmann assessment explores different styles people have when handling conflict.
Thomas and Kilmann identify five styles of handling conflict between two people: the Avoider, the Accommodater, the Compromiser, the Competitor and the Collaborator.
These types are arrayed in a graph with Assertiveness (defined as concern for the task, or as "thinks of self") on one axis, and Cooperation (defined as concern for people, or "thinks of others") on the other. In the lowest left hand corner is the Avoider, someone who'd rather not deal with conflict at all, and in the upper right hand corner, the corner where the highest level of Cooperation meets the highest level of Assertiveness, is the Collaborator. (Smack dab in the middle, as you'd expect, is the Compromiser, but we'll save that for another day.)
What fascinated me about this model is the light it sheds on Collaboration: where its power comes from, and what distinguishes it from Compromise. Certainly, there are situations in which compromise is adequate and even worthwhile. I'd like to go out for dinner, you'd like to stay home. Taken a step further, I'd like not to cook tonight, and you'd like not to get dressed up or spend a lot of money. A compromise on a nearby casual restaurant fits the bill perfectly, and you and I probably don't need to spend a minute more on a "conflict" like this. But a compromise is always a meeting in the middle, so each gets a little of what they want, and compromise often gets to a gray solution, not really satisfying to anyone but sort of appeasing everyone. In art, it's mixing a lot of colors to get mud.
Collaboration gets its power because it uses the energy of Assertiveness--ideas and real points of view, championed by people who care--and the energy of Cooperation--a willingness to make things work for all involved. From collaboration comes the best result, the idea or solution which is fashioned from everyone's input and is better than what any one person could have come up with on her or his own.
And a key point in all of this, a key ingredient in collaboration, is that it starts with conflict, but it doesn't end there. It takes the energy of the conflict--opposing or differing views, needs and goals--and the attitude of collaboration--the willingness to reach the best solution for all concerned--to get somewhere we've never been before, and somewhere we couldn't go alone.
I'll close with a quote from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
"A leader isn't a seeker of consensus, but a molder of consensus."
PS: If you love this kind of self-knowledge quiz, try our Trust Temperament assessment. Far cheaper and more revealing than a therapy session.Link to original post