Why is that leaders and the teams they lead often ignore their issues until they have no choice but to take action? This despite the fact that, more often than not, waiting longer limits their universe of available responses.
I work with a practice group in a professional services firm. They have regular meetings of timekeepers and staff. Lately at those meetings there was an elephant in the room - anxiety about how the economy was going to affect them. Rather than talk about what was really on their minds, they discussed administrative matters and client issues.
In a recent discussion with the practice group leader, I asked - "so what are you and your group going to to do to address the downturn?" My client hadn't really thought about it. Like many, the leader hoped the team could ride it out. I suggested "name it and claim it." It was simple - raise the issue for the group and talk about it. Some questions to ask:
· How busy are we?
· If we keep doing things the way we are now, what will happen?
· What do we need to do differently?
In such discussions, keep nothing off the table. On the cost side, address reductions - staffing, salary and other expenses. On the revenue side, consider new business activities, think about rates and fixed fee alternatives, figure out how to get paid sooner. Address the issues that have to be addressed. Get cveryone to take ownership of the problem. Put the elephant front and center, and deal with it as a group.
What happened? People got to share their anxieties in an appropriate way, own the problem and develop a solution together. They appreciated the opportunity to think out loud with each other.
Does it really matter why we procrastinate on such issues? Fear is probably at the heart of it. But the origin doesn't necessarily alter the action. What needs to be done is to name it, so we can claim it.
Do you have an elephant in the room that needs to be called out?
Link to original post