Is "engagement" becoming another one of those overused buzz words that's losing its meaning?
Mitch Lieberman, market strategist at Sword Ciboodle, offers a rich perspective on customer-facing and organizational issues. He recently posted on his A Title Would Limit My Thoughts blog about our collective efforts to define engagement. Mitch posits that we are likely doing better defining employee engagement - thanks to quantitative, shared objectives - than we are customer engagement.
In this conversation, Mitch and I explore how the term "engagement" is applied in the context of social media, as well as whether better employee engagement leads to better customer engagement.
We also talk about the recent Zappos security breach, exploring the crisis management action of and reactions to a company acknowledged for its extremely high customer and employee engagement.
Your easy takeaway from this conversion is that customer engagement is not a number you pull off of Facebook Insights. Your challenge may be to admit you've been tossing around the word "engagement" without nailing down a working definition.
This convo is sponsored by:
Vitrue, an original Facebook Preferred Developer Consultant, is the leading social marketing platform facilitating relationships between brands and their fans across multiple social networks via its software-as-a-service solutions. Social marketers and agencies world-wide use Vitrue's Social Relationship Management (SRM) platform and its Publisher, Tabs, Shop and Analytics products.
Brandwatch is one of the world's leading social media monitoring and analysis tools, with offices in the UK, US, Germany and Brazil. Global brands and agencies use our tool to cut through the noise on the social web and find the conversation that matters, empowering decisions that improve their business.
--
Neil Glassman is principal marketing strategist at WhizBangPowWow, where he delivers integrated social, digital and linear media solutions. Join his conversations on Twitter and Google +.