I'm hearing a lot from clients and researchers about how vast swaths of salespeople need to be eliminated as companies transition from selling products to services and solutions. The estimates range from one third of the sales force, according to these academics, to as much as two thirds.
It's portrayed as a DNA thing-some are born to do consultative selling and to have "executive-level conversations" and some are not.
Hogwash.
Now don't get me wrong. I do think there is a gene for sales. Great salespeople truly are born, not made. They have genetic tendencies towards extroversion, confidence, hope (some would say denial), relationship building, and the real differentiator: emotional perception-usually expressed as the ability to "read people" (and one's self). (For more on this, read about Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences.)
Why salespeople can't make the cut
But I think we start slicing the genetic material a little too thinly when we separate the product salespeople from the services salespeople. If you assume that we haven't hired the wrong people from the start-i.e., the order takers who never really had any true sales skills, or people who are so inflexible or fearful that they simply refuse to try to make the transition-I think we need something else to explain why so few salespeople seem able to make the cut.
I see two big reasons:
- Incentives. Salespeople are about the money. It's the yardstick of success and self-worth. Companies need to make it worth salespeople's while to endure the longer sales cycle and lower margins that come with services. Of course, devising those incentives, putting them in place, and driving the cultural change necessary to make them stick is a maddeningly complex process that helps keep consultants and academics in business.
- Information. This is the one that's actually within marketers' control. Information, not DNA, is the most important piece of the consultative sale and the executive-level relationship. With customers able to do so much research online, the way to get in the door these days is to have information that isn't readily available elsewhere.
Executives live under constant fear of myopia-that by focusing so much of their time on internal operations, they are missing something important out there in the market. Salespeople who can ameliorate those real or perceived fears with information-and keep doing it over time-will outsell the mere backslappers every time. The essence of this skill is always being able to answer the question: "What are you hearing from others?"
Information is marketing's responsibility
It's not salespeople' responsibility to come up with the answer to this question on their own. Executives are looking for reliable, objective, and insightful answers that go beyond an anecdotal summation of what's going on with the other accounts in a salesperson's territory.
If marketers aren't supplying salespeople with the answers they need, then we need to think of ourselves as partly responsible for all those salespeople going out the door in the transition from products to services. We need to supply salespeople with the information that will create the impression among customers that they are missing something if they don't stay in touch-an information dependency.
How to supply the information salespeople need
We need to set up a reliable pipeline of information that salespeople can access when and where they need it. Here's how:
- Get permission. Sales leaders need to agree that information is necessary for their people to succeed. If they don't, then the pipeline will feed into a black hole. You may need a third party, such as a sales consultant, to convince sales leaders that they need more than intuition to make the sale.
- Create incentives for sharing. The information pipeline will be stronger if salespeople have a reason to share information about their own accounts with other salespeople and with marketing. Salespeople need to be active contributors to the information pipeline.
- Monitor the chatter. Few salespeople have the time or the interest in giving marketers updates on what they're hearing out in the field. Marketers need to be able to capture that information by monitoring the channels that salespeople use to communicate with each other, whether it is through e-mail or CRM systems. Marketing automation and CRM vendors are beginning to offer ways to capture that kind of information.
- Do the research. Marketers need to do the primary and secondary research on markets and customers to lend the depth and objectivity necessary to create information dependency among customers. Surveys work particularly well for assuring customers that the information they're getting is more than a veiled sales pitch.
- Bring in the experts. Marketers need to identify and make alliances with internal subject matter experts, external academics, and analysts and filter and feed that information into the pipeline.
- Make it a joint pipeline. The channel for monitoring the chatter needs to be integrated with the channel marketing uses to pump information to sales-salespeople need a reason to access it as part of their normal routine.
- Make it self-service. Salespeople need easy access to the information that marketing gathers if they are to use it. If they can't find the information they need, they will quickly lose interest.
- Make it social. Take advantage of social media platforms to create information sharing groups for salespeople. There are ways to create private groups so that the public can't see your groups or the information you're sharing. Yammer is one great example of this.
What have I left out? How are you providing the information salespeople need to make the consultative sale?
Posted in Sales and Marketing Collaboration Tagged: B2B marketing, Marketing and Sales Collaboration, Marketing Automation, Marketing ProcessesLink to original post