
It turned out that the reference customers the software vendor had give us weren't actual customers but rather test sites. We were, in fact, the only live customer. The software was riddled with bugs and the interface to our previous production system was atrocious. For months, reporters and editors worked with both a terminal and a PC on their desks because the new system was so unreliable. The project, which was originally scheduled to last six months, dragged on more than three times that long.
This presented an interesting problem for our little experiment in transparency. The project was a disaster and the vendor, which had initially been enthusiastic about the idea, was now pleading with us not to document the problems we were experiencing. We continued with the diary, but as internal political pressures mounted, we toned down our coverage considerably. The extent of the disaster was never fully revealed.
This time, we don't have that option.

The event's website is currently standard brochureware, but CrossTech isn't t

Project Dogfood's name is a nod to that venerable tech industry phrase, "Eating our own dog food." It means companies should run themselves on the software they build for customers. As the site develops with input from the community, it will become the foundation for future New Marketing Summits. People who register for the events will be able to continue their conversations and relationships long after the curtain has rung down on the last speaker.
So go register! Tell us which topics you'd like to see and features you'd like us to include. And sign up for the New Marketing Summit while you're at it.
Unlike my previous experiment in transparency, this one doesn't have the option of backing out. You'll see a social network take shape before your eyes. And if we fall on our faces a couple of times, you'll see that, too. This is Web 2.0, after all!
Link to original post